Service Level Agreement Mistakes

Some service providers have a one-size-fits-all size for all ALS that they make available to all clients (for example. B 48-hour rotation for insurance policy applications); However, to provide service more efficiently and manage costs, it may be advantageous to follow a tailored approach to ALS. Z.B. can be defined on the basis of different client groups, with the best SLAs available to major customers. The decision should be guided by a cost-benefit analysis and be consistent with the Organization`s strategic objectives. J.J. Bouman, Trienekens, J.J.M. and van der Zwan, 1999. Specification of Service Level Agreements, clarification of concepts based on practical research, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop Software Technology and Engineering Practice, S. Tilley and J.

Verner (eds.), IEEE Computing Society, Los Alamitos, s. 103-111. If you`re like a lot of CIOs, there`s a good chance your company will compensate third-party IT service providers for something they haven`t done, or pay them twice for something. Technology leader Nipa Chakravarti realized that this was the case for TransAlta (Canada`s largest listed electricity producer and renewable energy supplier). Recently, I spoke to Nipa, and she made an interesting comment: “I want to get away from ALS-powered contracts.” A well-negotiated service level agreement helps protect the company if its provider is unable to provide services satisfactorily. Unfortunately, we rarely see adequate protection in standard boiler panel contracts from major service providers, an omission that could put the company at risk in the event of service problems. We advise our clients to seek at least these conditions: management elements should include definitions of standards and measurement methods, reporting processes, content and frequency, a dispute resolution procedure, a compensation clause to protect the client from third-party disputes resulting from service-level breaches (but this should already be included in the contract) and a mechanism to update the agreement as required. We are the way in which, in case of chronic problems or critical failures, you should have the full right to terminate the contract without a penalty of termination.

Most cloud service providers claim 99.95% availability. As a general rule, this number depends on certain conditions or restrictions. To ensure that you do not violate your agreement, you define all the conditions that affect your ALS in a clear way. Typically, these processes and methods are left to the outsourcing company to determine that these processes and methods can support the ALS agreement. However, it is recommended that the client and the outsourcing company work together during the SLA contract negotiations to clear up misunderstandings about the support process and method, as well as management and reporting methods. If we look at contracts like this, we know that it will not be long before we are mandated to review service agreements and assist in final negotiations. After reviewing and discussing the contract with our client, it`s time to get to work and get significant SLAs contained in their contract. Typically, this means a three-step process: a Service Level Agreement (SLA) defines the level of service a customer expects from a provider, defines the measures by which that service is measured, and corrective actions or penalties, if they exist, if agreed service levels are not met. As a general rule, SLAs are located between companies and external suppliers, but they can also be between two divisions within the same company. When sending a PSR, the customer must include the expected levels of service as part of the requirement.

This has an impact on suppliers` offers and prices and may even influence the supplier`s decision to respond. If you need z.B. 99.999 percent availability for a system and the provider cannot meet this requirement with the indicated design, it can offer another, more robust solution.

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed